MHo 2017-07-31 There's something that I don't understand:Why ist the runtime of
set pool1 [tpool::create -minworkers 10 -maxworkers 20 -idletime 10] for {set i 1} {$i <= 20} {incr i} { lappend jobs [tpool::post $pool1 {after 10000} } while {[llength $jobs]} { set ready [tpool::wait $pool1 $jobs jobs] }double the time of
set pool1 [tpool::create -minworkers 20 -maxworkers 20 -idletime 10] for {set i 1} {$i <= 20} {incr i} { lappend jobs [tpool::post $pool1 {after 10000} } while {[llength $jobs]} { set ready [tpool::wait $pool1 $jobs jobs] }The first call runs ~20,xs, the second one, as expected, ~10,xs.The documentation states, the only difference is the time at which the workers are created - beforehand, or "on demand" when a post is done. As there are enough -maxworkers defined, what is limiting the operation then...?I also asked this on that page: Ask, and it shall be given # 12I've looked at several examples that I've found here and there, and it seems that almost everyone sets -min == -max..... There must be something misterious around this values. I can also specify -minworkers 40 -maxworkers 20, no problem. 40 Workers are created.... Ok, this last fact becomes clear after looking at the c-source:
if (minw > maxw) { maxw = minw; }Even more mystery....it works as expected with this little variation:
set pool1 [tpool::create -minworkers 1 -idletime 10] for {set i 1} {$i <= 20} {incr i} { lappend jobs [tpool::post $pool1 {after 10000} puts $jobs; # <--------- mystery } while {[llength $jobs]} { set ready [tpool::wait $pool1 $jobs jobs] }So, I think the answer to myself is for now:Posting jobs one after another without doing something between each iteration blocks the start of new threads. Btw, it's not clear, what something exactly is, and why it helps....