proc lrsearch {list el {prefix {}} } { set pos [lsearch $list $el] if {$pos != -1} {return [concat $prefix $pos]} for {set i 0} {$i<[llength $list]} {incr i} { set ilist [lindex $list $i] if {![atomic? $ilist]} { set pos [lrsearch $ilist $el [concat $prefix $i]] if {$pos != -1} {return $pos} } } return -1 }To prevent endless recursion, but still handle lists that have only one element on higher level, the atomic? test was introduced: it is true if the first element of the list is equal to the list itself, so that no further lindexing could bring any new facts.
proc atomic? {list} {string equal $list [lindex $list 0]}
% lrsearch {a b {c {d e}}} a 0 % lrsearch {a b {c {d e}}} b 1 % lrsearch {a b {c {d e}}} c 2 0 % lrsearch {a b {c {d e}}} d 2 1 0 % lrsearch {a b {c {d e}}} e 2 1 1 % lrsearch {a b {c {d e}}} f -1 % lrsearch {a {{b c}} d} b 1 0 0, e.g. set s {a b {a b {a b c {a, e.g. set s {a b {a b {a b c {a d e c {a b c} c}}} d e} d e c {a b c} c}}} d e}
Michael Schlenker likes to do things a bit faster; this is between 5 and 25 percent faster (with 8.3 and 8.4b1) than the solution above, by using foreach/incr instead of for/lindex:
proc lrsearch2 {list el {prefix {}} } { set pos [lsearch $list $el] if {-1 != $pos} {return [concat $prefix $pos]} set i 0 foreach ilist $list { if {![atomic? $ilist]} { set pos [lrsearch2 $ilist $el [concat $prefix $i]] if {-1 != $pos} {return $pos} } incr i } return -1gs a bit faster; this is between 5 and 25 percent faster (with 8.3 and 8.4b1) than the solution above, by using [f }
[serol] 2010-11-19: I needed a slightly modified lrsearch to get the number of occurrences of string in a nested list.
proc lrsearch2 {liste el} { #get occurences in liste set count [llength [lsearch -all -inline $liste $el]] foreach ilist $liste { if {![atomic? $ilist]} { incr count [lrsearch2 $ilist $el] } } return $count }